Thursday 27 January 2011

Why you can't have your cake and eat it too


We pay for a lot of things in the world. Almost everything in fact. What was the last thing you got for free? I’ve spent five minutes trying to think of the last thing I got for free and all I've come up with is a piece of cake my housemate gave me last week – and to be fair, that's more of a customer loyalty gift as my rent is paying his mortgage!

I can log onto a news website and read stories. That is free, as long as I have a computer and an internet connection. But not probably for long. Three of News International’s publications have already disappeared behind a pay wall – The Times, News of The World and The Sunday Times. The only one still available for free is The Sun, but by the end of this year that too will be a pay-for service.

When News Corp’s boss Rupert Murdoch installed a pay wall on The Times’ website, it cost them 66 per cent of their readers - a dramatic decline, but not as steep as many had forecast. The site had been expected to lose 90% of its traffic. There is something stopping me paying for news online. I am happy to buy a newspaper because I have something tangible to show for it. I can get annoyed at the newsprint in leaves on my fingers and I can feel guilty at the end of the day when I realise I haven’t had a chance to read anything other than client-related stories and the front page. Having worked on a weekly newspaper myself, I also know the amount of work it takes to produce the finished product.

But I don’t like paying for something and having nothing to show for it. So I will continue to buy newspapers, but I won’t pay for the same thing online. I’m not saying I will never pay for online content, but for now I’m not convinced.

When it comes to PR there is nothing like presenting a client with a newspaper clipping – it’s seen as the pinnacle. But why? Maybe it’s the newspaper print. Maybe it’s holding something solid, something that won’t change or disappear. Sure, a new edition will be out tomorrow, but you can keep that old one forever. There is a certain charm and traditionalism about newspapers that people just don’t seem ready to let go of. Will paid-for online content hold that same charm for our Grandchildren? I can’t imagine a world without newspapers, but I guess we will have to wait and see.

But if I want the freshest news from around the world, I’m going to have to face the fact the online news has become a product like a newspaper, in the sense that I will have to pay for it. A newspaper only gets updated daily – at best. I want to read a newspaper, but I want it to be the freshest news. I’ve got a classic case of having cake and wanting to eat it too – but what’s the point of having cake if you can’t eat it?

1 comment:

matt said...

I think that we are starting to see new news channels emerge that are free - for example, I found out about Coulson's departure through Twitter before the BBC had been able to file the story.

Yes, you have to have have paid for access to the Internet, but things like twitter are also free in the sense of not have any sort of proprietorial editorial control... that's free(dom) unlike most newspapers in history...